Analyzing data starting in 2010 and drawing from 26 years of personal experience as a First Chair patent litigator, Engelberg Center Fellow Patricia Martone explores the current state of women at the top of patent litigation.

A panel of experts explore the balance between femtech and privacy as it exists post-Dobbs.

The ability to manufacture and distribute locally is key to unlocking the full potential of open hardware.

An examinaion of the state of open source hardware in 2021.

This paper distills technical barriers users face in transferring data between services.

This paper suggests legislative reforms to the patent term extension provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act to restrict improper patent term extensions and make the patent system more democratic and transparent to the public.

This white paper explores how the efforts of makers, organizations, and government regulators came together to respond to equipment shortages in the early days of the COVID-19 crisis.

The report is a snapshot of the open source hardware community as it exists in 2020, ten years after the first Open Hardware Summit.

This paper explores options for improving data portability between technology platforms.

This report discusses the need for cost transparency into pharmaceutical research and development and transparency into the costs of clinical trials funded by the National Institutes of Health, and proposes a set of reforms to achieve that goal.

A guide for digitizing and making available 3D cultural resources as part of an Open Access program.

Turning the Camera Around explores the public’s right to record police officers in public spaces.

Congestion Privacy investigates the privacy impact of New York City’s congestion pricing system.

The paper explores how useful data exported from Facebook might be to a potential competitor. The answer: not very.

A project to develop an ethical open source software license for the ml5.js software library.

A lively debate on the state of open source hardware at the 2020 Open Hardware Summit.

How can lawyers determine what drives creators and accused appropriators and can that be communicated to fact finders?

How are issues identified as ‘ripe’ for reform, and what is the best way to shape the reform process in the area of intellectual property?

Keynote presentation from Judge Raymond Chen ‘94, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Expert witnesses from both sides of the Blurred Lines case discuss how to analyze and communicate similarities and differences of creative works, and the role that technology plays in defining the works to be compared.

What are the best ways to approach market definitions, demands, and harms?

What are the most effective ways to calculate and apportion damages?

What are the best ways to test what consumers and users perceive about a work and how it is being positioned in the market?

How can you show what it means to contribute sufficient creativity for a work to be protected by intellectual property?

Judge Pierre Leval, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, delivers his keynote address.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

The Engelberg Center Annual Report captures the people, activities, courses, events, and research that made up the year.

In the final episode of the Kickstarter United Oral History, the union works through the COVID-19 pandemic as organizers reflect on their experiences forming the union.

The votes have been cast - now it is time for them to be counted.

Kickstarter workers cast votes on unionization.

Organizers demand recognition from management.

Three more organizers leave Kickstarter.

A closer look at two organizer experiences.

Leadership’s anti union strategy slows organizing to a stop and organizers begin to lose hope.

Leadership officially comes out as anti union and tips the scale in their favor.

Management officially comes out as anti union.

Management discovers the union and begins to implement a strategy.

Things are heating up! Episodes every two weeks.

Workers help each other through retaliation and resolve to build a union.

The specific events that led to the first utterance of “union.”

A window into how Kickstarter’s culture encouraged collective action.

Why are tech workers forming unions? Hear directly from employees who built Kickstarter’s Union about why they thought a union was the structural change their tech campaign needed.

This oral history centers the first hand accounts of organizers and uses documentation to deepen the narrative.

This oral history is a chorus of unique voices and perspectives. Together we’ll hear how workers and organizers speak to one another and how they learn from each other.

In this episode, we talk through the so called “unanticipated consequences” of the 2019 European copyright directive.

The Engelberg Center brings you a ten part series chronicling the formation of the first tech company union in US history.

On today’s episode we focus on what the final text of Article 17 requires in terms of its two-fold licensing and filtering mandate.

An audio postcard from the world of IP litigation in the middle of a pandemic.

A discussion about Glam3D.org with its creators.

COVID-19 contact tracing through mobile devices and applications has become prevalent and popular around the globe but questions remain.

Co-hosted by the Engelberg Center and R Street, this panel discussion focused on innovation during the COVID-19 crisis.

Professor Sarah Lamdan discusses her new book Data Cartels with MarketWatch Enterprise Reporter Shoshana Wodinsky.

Today’s episode is a conversation with MSCHF from the Fake Symposium.

Jessica Silbey and Rebecca Giblin discuss their new books “Against Progress” and “Chokepoint Capitalism” with Engelberg Center Faculty Co-Director Jason Schultz.

Today’s episode is the Fake Intellectual Property panel from the Fake Symposium.

Today’s episode is the Fake Art panel from the Fake Symposium.

Today’s episode is the Fake Social Media Movements in Culture, Advocacy, and Policy panel from the Fake Symposium.

Today’s episode is the Fake Goods and the Problem with Authenticity panel from the Fake Symposium.

Today’s episode is the framing discussion that served as an introduction to the Fake Symposium.

Siva Vaidhyanathan’s keynote speech from the Fake Symposium.

Engelberg Center Faculty Co-Director Jason Schultz discussed the nature of ownership in a digital world, and how this connects with ebooks shared by the Internet Archive.

Focusing on the experiences of the Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK), New York Public Library, and National Gallery of Art, Pioneers of Open explores early days in pioneering open access programs.